Martin Immigration Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Publications
    • Privacy Policy
    • Texas Lawyer's Creed and SBOT Grievance Brochure
  • Blog
  • Services
  • FAQs and Videos
  • Contact
  • Useful Links
  • Fee increase
  • E Treaty countries

BLOG

US DHS Expands Authority to Commence Removal Proceedings

7/11/2018

0 Comments

 
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued new guidance to immigration officers, allowing them to initiate removal (deportation) proceedings. The new guidance greatly expands the circumstances when USCIS will issue a Notice to Appear (NTA), i.e. the document that starts proceedings. 

USCIS was never meant to be tasked with immigration enforcement. When the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was created after 9/11, immigration was separated into three agencies:
  • USCIS was created to administer benefits;
  • ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) was assigned enforcement responsibilities in the interior of the US;
  • CBP (Customs and Border Protection) is responsible for protecting the border.

USCIS has long had the authority to issue NTAs and initiate removal proceedings. However, it typically only did so in serious cases that met DHS’s enforcement priorities. USCIS rarely, if ever, issued an NTA after the denial of an employment-based application for benefits when an applicant had no history of fraud, criminal activity or immigration violations.

In early 2017, however, President Trump issued an executive order that greatly expanded DHS’s enforcement priorities to include a wide range of conduct that was not previously prosecuted, and ordered agencies to develop policies consistent with these priorities. In turn, DHS issued an implementing memorandum limiting immigration officials’ authority to use discretion to decline to prosecute certain classes of foreign national, subjecting many more foreign nationals to removal proceedings. USCIS’s new NTA policy is an extension of the executive order and the DHS memorandum.

Specifically, the new policy "...requires USCIS to issue an NTA in the following categories of cases in which the individual is removable...

  • Cases where fraud or misrepresentation is substantiated, and/or where an applicant abused any program related to the receipt of public benefits. USCIS will issue an NTA even if the case is denied for reasons other than fraud.
  • Criminal cases where an applicant is convicted of or charged with a criminal offense, or has committed acts that are chargeable as a criminal offense, even if the criminal conduct was not the basis for the denial or the ground of removability. USCIS may refer cases involving serious criminal activity to ICE before adjudication of an immigration benefit request pending before USCIS without issuing an NTA.
  • Cases in which USCIS denies a Form N-400, Application for Naturalization, on good moral character grounds because of a criminal offense.
  • Cases in which, upon the denial of an application or petition, an applicant is unlawfully present in the United States."

The final bullet point above is one that most alarms immigration lawyers, especially given the increasingly hostile immigration environment in which we work now. USCIS is denying perfectly good cases; issuing arbitrary Requests for Evidence asking for additional information (e.g. asking for proof that a structural engineer really requires a bachelor's degree; requesting a new medical report when the existing medical was unexpired, etc); claiming documents were not provided when they were sent; losing checks, etc.  If a case is denied due to USCIS mistake or overreach and a client is placed into removal proceedings, the consequences are devastating. 

As noted by the American Immigration Council, "This move essentially ends all prosecutorial discretion, a key tool used by law enforcement and prosecutors all over the country to effectively prioritize cases. In the past, immigration agencies used prosecutorial discretion when deciding under what circumstances to issue NTAs.

Past leaders of USCIS have issued memos against the practice of widespread NTA issuance, noting it was impractical, would divert scarce resources, create longer wait times, and clog the immigration courts. Further, denials of immigration benefits applications are often reversed upon reconsideration or appeal. This means that thousands of cases that will ultimately be approved will be needlessly tossed onto the dockets of an already overburdened court system."

​We are very closely monitoring the impact of this and all other changes. We cannot stress enough how dangerous it is to file applications without an immigration lawyer, given the current environment.

Please contact us if you have any concerns.
0 Comments
<<Previous
    Lawyer Elaine Martin | Top Attorney Immigration

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

        Author

    Elaine Martin has been practising US and global immigration law since 1997. She is an immigrant herself (from Ireland), so has a special understanding of the legal and emotional challenges involved in relocating to a new country.

    Picture

    Archives

    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014

    Categories

    All
    Adjustment Of Status
    Affidavit Of Support
    Africa
    Algeria
    B-1 In Lieu Of H-1B
    Backlogs
    #borderwall
    Brazil
    Cameroon
    Cancellation Of Removal
    Chad
    China
    Citizenship
    Conditional Permanent Residence
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Covid19
    Cuba
    DACA
    DAPA
    Department Of Labor
    Department Of State
    Deportation
    Diversity Visa
    Donald Trump
    DOS Travel Warning
    DS-5540
    E-1
    E 2
    E-2
    EAD
    EB 5
    EB-5
    El Salvador
    Entrepreneur
    Environment
    F-1
    FAQ
    FCPA
    FIFA
    Filing Fees
    Green Card
    H 1B
    H-1B
    H-1B Portability
    H 2
    H-2
    H-2B
    H 4
    H-4
    Haiti
    Honduras
    I-407
    I-9
    I-90
    I-944
    #immigrationaction
    Infographic
    Investor
    Iran
    Iraq
    Israel
    J-1
    L 1
    L-1
    L-1B
    Labor Condition Application
    LCA
    Liberia
    Libya
    Lottery
    M-1
    Marriage Based
    Marriage-based
    Mexico
    Muslim
    Naturalization
    Nepal
    New Zealand
    Nigeria
    North Korea
    Notice To Appear
    Obama
    Overstay
    Permanent Residence
    Portability
    Poverty Guidelines
    Preference Categories
    Premium Processing
    Prevailing Wage
    Priority Dates
    Public Charge
    Reentry Permit
    Religious Workers
    Removal
    Returning Resident Visa
    Scam
    Schengen
    Shutdown
    Somalia
    Statistics
    Student
    Success Stories
    Sudan
    Supreme Court
    Syria
    TPS
    Travel Ban
    Undocumented
    USCIS
    VAWA
    Venezuela
    Video
    Violence Against Women Act
    Visa Bulletin
    Visa-bulletin
    Visa Waiver
    Yemen
    YouTube

    RSS Feed

Disclaimer
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice from Dallas lawyer Elaine Martin. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until an attorney-client relationship has been established.
© 2014-2020 by Martin Law Office, Dallas. All rights reserved.  Privacy Policy
Photos used under Creative Commons from andryn2006, susivinh, Simon & His Camera, lwpkommunikacio, NazionaleCalcio, RussBowling, Phillip Pessar, Hichem Merouche, Lars Plougmann, Colby Stopa, superscheeli, miguel.discart, Asian Development Bank, Tim simpson1, eurleif
  • Home
  • About
    • Publications
    • Privacy Policy
    • Texas Lawyer's Creed and SBOT Grievance Brochure
  • Blog
  • Services
  • FAQs and Videos
  • Contact
  • Useful Links
  • Fee increase
  • E Treaty countries