Martin Immigration Law
  • Home
  • About
    • Publications
    • Privacy Policy
    • Texas Lawyer's Creed and SBOT Grievance Brochure
  • Blog
  • Services
  • FAQs and Videos
  • Contact
  • Useful Links
  • Fee increase
  • E Treaty countries

BLOG

Final L-1B Policy Memo Issued

8/20/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently the much-anticipated final L-1B Adjudication Policy Memorandum. In late March of 2015, USCIS released a draft Policy Memorandum, with requests for comments.  USCIS released the final version of the L-1B Policy Memo on August 17, 2015, which “supersedes and rescinds” some prior various L-1B memoranda.

The new L-1B Policy Memo follows years of increasingly strict adjudication of L-1B petitions, and was one of the White House’s initiatives on immigration.

Background

L-1 visas are issued to intracompany transferee, coming to work in the US from a related entity overseas. The L-1A category is for managers and executives, and L-1Bs are issued to employees with “specialized knowledge”. An increasingly strict interpretation of “specialized knowledge” is what caused a spike in L-1B denials in recent years, to the concern of employers and immigration lawyers.

“Specialized Knowledge” Definition

The L-1B memo provides a detailed description of the history of changes to the definition of “specialized knowledge” over the years, through legislation and earlier (now superseded) memoranda.  The L-1B Memo then explains that a petitioner must establish eligibility by a “preponderance of the evidence” standard.

The memo explains the difference between “specialized” and “advanced knowledge.”

Special knowledge is

“…distinct or uncommon in comparison to that normally found in the particular industry.” (emphasis added).

“…concerns knowledge of the petitioning organization’s products or services and its application in international markets.” (emphasis added).

Advanced knowledge is

“ …greatly developed or further along in progress, complexity and understanding than that general found within the employer.” (emphasis added).

“  knowledge of a petitioning organization’s processes and procedures that is not commonly found in the relevant industry…” (emphasis added).

The memo explained that an employee can have both special and advanced knowledge, but that one type is enough for L-1B eligibility.

Further, the L-1B Policy Memo allows for the possibility where all of a company’s employees may possess “specialized knowledge”, particularly when these employees work on technologies or techniques that are so advanced or complex that nearly all employees working in this area have specialized knowledge.

Proving Specialized Knowledge

The memo states that the …”petitioner’s statement may be persuasive evidence if it is detailed, specific and credible” Nevertheless, we strongly advise using supporting evidence, and these are examples provided by USCIS:

  • Documentation of training, work experience, or education establishing the number of years the individual has been using or developing the claimed specialized knowledge as an employee of the petitioning organization or in the industry.

  • Evidence of the impact, if any, the transfer of the individual would have on the petitioning organization’s U.S. operations.

  • Evidence that the alien is qualified to contribute significantly to the U.S. operation’s knowledge of foreign operating conditions as a result of knowledge not generally found in the petitioning organization’s U.S. operations.

  • Contracts, statements of work, or other documentation that shows that the beneficiary possesses knowledge that is particularly beneficial to the petitioning organization’s competitiveness in the marketplace.

  •  Evidence, such as correspondence or reports, establishing that the beneficiary has been employed abroad in a capacity involving assignments that have significantly enhanced the petitioning organization’s productivity, competitiveness, image, or financial position.

  • Personnel or in-house training records that establish that the beneficiary’s claimed specialized knowledge normally can be gained only through prior experience or training with the petitioning organization.

  • Curricula and training manuals for internal training courses, financial documents, or other evidence that may demonstrate that the beneficiary possesses knowledge of a product or process that cannot be transferred or taught to another individual without significant economic cost or inconvenience.

  • Evidence of patents, trademarks, licenses, or contracts awarded to the petitioning organization based on the beneficiary’s work, or similar evidence that the beneficiary has knowledge of a process or a product that either is sophisticated or complex, or of a highly technical nature, although not necessarily proprietary or unique to the petitioning organization.

  • Payroll documents, federal or state wage statements, documentation of other forms of compensation, resumes, organizational charts, or similar evidence documenting the positions held and the compensation provided to the beneficiary and parallel employees in the petitioning organization.

The memo states that “…the petitioner is required in all cases to compare the beneficiary’s knowledge to that of others.”

Some factors that USCIS states will demonstrate specialized knowledge are:

  • The beneficiary possesses knowledge of foreign operating conditions that is of significant value to the petitioning organization’s U.S. operations.

  • The beneficiary has been employed abroad in a capacity involving assignments that have significantly enhanced the employer’s productivity, competitiveness, image, or financial position.

  • The beneficiary’s claimed specialized knowledge normally can be gained only through prior experience with the petitioning organization.

  • The beneficiary possesses knowledge of a product or process that cannot be easily transferred or taught to another individual without significant economic cost or inconvenience (because, for example, such knowledge may require substantial training, work experience, or education).

  • The beneficiary has knowledge of a process or a product that either is sophisticated or complex, or of a highly technical nature, although not necessarily unique to the petitioning organization.

  •  The beneficiary possesses knowledge that is particularly beneficial to the petitioning organization’s competitiveness in the marketplace.

Tomorrow’s blog posting will discuss the remainder of the memo, covering offside L-1B employment and extensions of status.




0 Comments
<<Previous
    Lawyer Elaine Martin | Top Attorney Immigration

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

        Author

    Elaine Martin has been practising US and global immigration law since 1997. She is an immigrant herself (from Ireland), so has a special understanding of the legal and emotional challenges involved in relocating to a new country.

    Picture

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014

    Categories

    All
    Adjustment Of Status
    Affidavit Of Support
    Africa
    Algeria
    B-1 In Lieu Of H-1B
    Backlogs
    #borderwall
    Brazil
    Cameroon
    Cancellation Of Removal
    Chad
    China
    Citizenship
    Conditional Permanent Residence
    Coronavirus
    Corruption
    Covid19
    Cuba
    DACA
    DAPA
    Department Of Labor
    Department Of State
    Deportation
    Diversity Visa
    Donald Trump
    DOS Travel Warning
    DS-5540
    E-1
    E 2
    E-2
    EAD
    EB 5
    EB-5
    El Salvador
    Entrepreneur
    Environment
    F-1
    FAQ
    FCPA
    FIFA
    Filing Fees
    Green Card
    H 1B
    H-1B
    H-1B Portability
    H 2
    H-2
    H-2B
    H 4
    H-4
    Haiti
    Honduras
    I-407
    I-9
    I-944
    #immigrationaction
    Infographic
    Investor
    Iran
    Iraq
    Israel
    J-1
    L 1
    L-1
    L-1B
    Labor Condition Application
    LCA
    Liberia
    Libya
    Lottery
    M-1
    Marriage Based
    Marriage-based
    Mexico
    Muslim
    Naturalization
    Nepal
    New Zealand
    Nigeria
    North Korea
    Notice To Appear
    Obama
    Overstay
    Permanant Residence
    Portability
    Poverty Guidelines
    Preference Categories
    Premium Processing
    Prevailing Wage
    Priority Dates
    Public Charge
    Reentry Permit
    Religious Workers
    Removal
    Returning Resident Visa
    Scam
    Schengen
    Shutdown
    Somalia
    Statistics
    Student
    Success Stories
    Sudan
    Supreme Court
    Syria
    TPS
    Travel Ban
    Undocumented
    USCIS
    VAWA
    Venezuela
    Video
    Violence Against Women Act
    Visa Bulletin
    Visa-bulletin
    Visa Waiver
    Yemen
    YouTube

    RSS Feed

Disclaimer
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice from Dallas lawyer Elaine Martin. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until an attorney-client relationship has been established.
© 2014-2020 by Martin Law Office, Dallas. All rights reserved.  Privacy Policy
Photos used under Creative Commons from andryn2006, susivinh, Simon & His Camera, lwpkommunikacio, NazionaleCalcio, RussBowling, Phillip Pessar, Hichem Merouche, Lars Plougmann, Colby Stopa, superscheeli, miguel.discart, Asian Development Bank, Tim simpson1, eurleif
  • Home
  • About
    • Publications
    • Privacy Policy
    • Texas Lawyer's Creed and SBOT Grievance Brochure
  • Blog
  • Services
  • FAQs and Videos
  • Contact
  • Useful Links
  • Fee increase
  • E Treaty countries